THE REAL REASON TO OPPOSE AID TO ISRAEL
by
I. Dean Ahmad, Ph.D.
Minaret
of Freedom Institute
[As submitted
to Liberty, printed in a revised form as “The Dark Side of Israel”
in v. 15 #4 (April 2001), p.39.]
Over
a year ago Gideon Levy wrote in a major Israeli newspaper (Levy, G.
Ha`aretz 4 April 1999), "The Kosovo tragedy has already taken place
[in Palestine] and it could happen again here."Although
the murder of eighty unarmed civilians this October have shown Levy's
words to be prophetic, you will find no such comments in the mainstream
American newspapers. Instead, the victims are blamed.The
degree of unconditional pro-Israeli bias in America sometimes surprises
even Israel’s most knowledgeable critics.In describing the moves to suppress his book criticizing the excesses
of Israeli secret police, Victor Ostrovsky recounts the chilling words
of Yosef Lapid, the former head of Israeli television. On a Canadian
television program, Lapid announced that, “since Israel's Mossad could
not kill me [Ostrovsky] in Canada without causing a diplomaticincident,” Lapid hoped that “there would be a decent Jew in Canada
who would do the job for us” (Ostrovsky, V. Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs Oct.-Nov 1997 p. 37).To
Ostrovsky’s astonishment, the media which could not get enough of denouncing
Khomeini’s fatwa threatening capital punishment to Salman Rushdie for
exercising his right to publish hate literature exhibited indifference
to Lapid’s call for the murder of Ostrovsky for writing an exposé
of Israel’s secret police.
Some
libertarians contribute to this conspiracy of silence in their own way
when they apologetically mumble that it is only a commitment to an abstract
general principle that forces us to oppose foreign aid, even to Israel.This meek defense gives listeners the impression
that abandoning government funding of noble and worthy causes is the
price that one must pay to adopt libertarian principles. Such a fallacious
impression deprives the public of an opportunity to see that government
funding of causes is the most surefire way of guaranteeing that unworthy
causes will be funded.Israel
is Exhibit A of this unavoidable fact.
The libertarian
position is characterized, above all, by its commitment to non-aggression,
to the universality of individual rights, and to the importance of the
right of private property.Israel
is an uncompromisingly militarist, racist, and collectivist entity in
its conception and its fifty-one year history.Israel’s
militarism has been defended by the claim that it is a tiny Jewish nation
in a sea of hostile Arabs.However,
this hostility is not due, as is maliciously suggested, to religious
disagreements, but rather to the nation-state status of Israel itself.History
attests to the coexistence of Jews and Arabs under Muslim rule. The
Romans expelled the Jews from Jerusalem.When
the Muslims captured Jerusalem in the 7th century, Umar, the second
Caliph, allowed the Christian inhabitants to stay, to keep their land,
property and churches, and to practice their religion freely.He
did not fulfill only one request that the Christians made: he allowed
the Jews to return.Centuries
later, the Crusaders banned the Jews once again after massacring Jewish,
Muslim, and even some Arab Christian occupants of the city. When Saladin
recaptured the city, he again let the Jews back in.Only
the Hashemite kings Abdullah (who ruled Jerusalem from 1948-52) and
Hussein (who ruled Jerusalem from 1952-67) departed from this tradition.They excluded the Jews from Jerusalem not for
religious reasons, but in retaliation for the Zionist expulsion of the
Palestinians from their homes and lands.
The racism
of Israel is transparent in the policy of “the Law of Return.”Any Jew may become a full citizen of Israel,
but the non-Jewish Palestinians who were born there and fled or were
expelled may not return.Thus,
Samuel Sheinbein can escape trial in the United States, where the brutal
murder and mutilation of a fellow student of which he is accused was
committed, but my mother, born and raised in Jerusalem, couldn't return
to escape a parking ticket.
Even
those who remained in their homeland are granted only a second-class
citizenship, barred from receiving many of the subsidies of the heavily
socialized state, but not exempt from the oppressive tax rates.In
fact there are Palestinians in Israel who are treated as "present absentees"
and denied a return to their villages.Israeli authorities systematically use the usual
government regulatory devices, which are anathema to libertarians, against
the Palestinians to prevent them from building or expanding their houses
because authorities deny them the building permits routinely granted
to Jewish citizens. For the residents of Jerusalem, things are worst
of all.They are illegally occupied in the land of their
birth and yet Israel treats them as visitors.They are considered “permanent residents” whose residency permits
can be taken away if they go abroad, for example, to study.Jews may have dual citizenship (and many do)
but a non-Jewish Jerusalemite will lose his residency if he acquires
American citizenship. Arab Jerusalemites who marry persons from outside
the city must choose between giving up their residency or leaving town
because non-Jews are not allowed to obtain residency.
And make
no mistake: the definition of a Jew here is racial and not religious.Under Israeli law your Jewish mother is what
makes you a Jew.An Israeli need
not follow the Mosaic law (nor even believe in God) to qualify as a
Jew as long as his mother meets the ethnic requirements.(Interestingly,
however, the Israeli High Court has ruled that Messianic Jews, meaning
Jews who accept Jesus as the Messiah, lose their status as Jews.) While
Jewish teachings themselves do not promote discrimination against non-Jews,
the so-called Jewish state of Israel binds itself less to actual religion
than to ethnicity. Israel grants full citizenship including property
rights, subsidies, and individual rights to anyone of any nationality
who is of Jewish ethnicity regardless of that person’s religious beliefs.Ben Gurion University political geographer Oren
Yiftachel has rightly noted that such a form of government is an "ethnocracy"
rather than a democracy.
The most
interesting issue to libertarians is the issue of private property rights.Even the most pro-Zionist libertarian will fault
Israel for its staunch socialism.The
collectivism of Israel, however, is not just a flaw in Zionism, it is
the core of the ideology.To appreciate
this one should note that at the time of Israel’s founding, Jews, Zionist
and non-Zionist alike, owned less than 7% of the land.This included land recently acquired from absentee
landlords.Thus, the Jewish National
Fund demanded of the new government that it use its power of eminent
domain to seize the land so that it could “acquire this year … as much
land as it acquired in 47 years of unremitting effort.” (Jewish National
Fund, Jewish Villages in Israel. Jerusalem: Keren Kayemeth Leisrael
1949.)This land was not to be turned over to private
Jewish ownership.It was to be
turned over to collective ownership of the Jewish people. This meant
two things: (1) that it would never again be put into private hands;
and (2) that it would never again be used (rented, leased) by non-Jews.Under current Israeli law the same restrictions apply to state-owned
land.
A recent
example of the Israeli disregard for private property was the takeover
of land near the village of Dir Kadis.A
press release issued by the Israeli Peace Bloc (Gush Shalom) noted that
verbal protests by the Palestinian titleholders to the land were ignored.On May 23rd 1999, when the villagers tried to
stop the bulldozers from leveling their property, Israeli soldiers shot
tear gas canisters into their houses, causing one miscarriage and wounding
several (including children).
The techniques
for justifying land seizure are many and varied: from the ever-popular
seizures by the military for “security needs” to the claiming of land
“abandoned” by refugees.In the
occupied territories, Israelis employ a series of strategies to keep
pressure on the indigenous people to leave.The
curfews that have kept people indoors for 22 hours a day, the closures
that prevent them from going to work, and the road system that cuts
farms in half exemplify the difficult conditions Palestinians must experience.Although illegal under international law, outright deportations constitute
yet another weapon to which Israelis freely resort to seize Palestinian
land.
Land
is not the only target of looting. Israel does not have enough water
to support the enormous numbers of immigrants it needs to keep outpacing
the fecund Arab population. To maintain the stream of immigrants, the
Zionist lobby induced the U.S. Congress’s endorsement of stricter immigration
laws to make entering the United States harder for Jews from the former
Soviet block.Unable to come to their first-choice destination,
most end up in Israel where the water supply falls short of supporting
the artificially increased population.As a result, the Israelis raid the aquifer in the occupied territories
to meet their needs (Swain, A. Arab Studies Quarterly v. 20 #1 Winter
1998, p. 1). When the Palestinians wells go dry, a predictable negative
or silent response meets their request for permits to dig deeper wells.Meanwhile the illegal settlers get all the water
they want from the dropping aquifer in addition to all the land they
seized from the Palestinians.
And so
it goes.Looting the Palestinians
(of their land and water) and looting the American taxpayers (of their
money).And there is no end in sight.Rather than cut aid to Israel, the American government
has supplemented it with aid to Egypt (about $1 billion per year) and
now to the Palestinian Authority (less than $100 million).I need not emphasize that neither of them are
libertarian paradises, either.The
authoritarian style with which Yasser Arafat conducted his military
operations is ill-suited to the would-be democracy to which civilian
Palestinian leaders like those elected to the Palestinian Legislative
Council aspire.In essence, American taxpayers continue to contribute
(however tiny the amount may be) to the suppression of a potential democracy.There
are libertarians among the Palestinians, but they have no more chance
to prevail in the presence of American aid to the PNA than libertarians
in Israel have prevailed.
Morality
cannot be divided from the practical consequences of action.The coerced nature of foreign aid lends itself to the promotion of
evil purposes.(Even if coerced
subsidies are allocated to an initially laudatory purpose, the certainty
of its continued receipt regardless of conduct will eventually corrupt
the receiving party.) Overlooking the racist, militarist and collectivist
purposes to which aid to Israel is put undermines rather than enhances
the libertarian position.